In each class, unless I state otherwise, I will evaluate your paper using the following rubric.

• A: Clarity of writing. Proper grammar. (5 pts)
• B: Proper citations. Proper bibliography. Are the sources properly cited? Are the sources appropriate sources (e.g., peer reviewed research)? (5 pts)
• C: Clear thesis statement that is then actually defended in the paper. (5 pts)
• D: Significance of thesis. Is it relevant to the debate, is it something that we need to help resolve? (5 pts)
• E: Use of text to defend your position; close evaluation of the actual claims or arguments the relevant authors make. Same for any other philosopher cited or reasoned about. (10 pts)
• F: Development of an identifiable valid argument, ideally at some point in the paper stated in "argument form"--that is, as premises followed by the conclusion (which should be the thesis statement). (10 pts)
• G: Consideration of the most likely objections to your thesis. Answer to these objections. (5 pts)
• H: Fairness or accuracy of treatment. (Are you reading the philosopher or work with sufficient charity? Is your interpretation of the work plausible?) (5 pts)